Tables of niet ? Pixelperfecte layout of generische RSS-layout ? Inhoud of vorm ?

Volgens OK/Cancel gaat het over beide.

Stepping back from the fray we see that ultimately, all these frustrations arise because designers want pixel-accurate control over design, while others have insisted that the web is “not about pixel-accurate design”. This is an old debate, and one that in my mind has only recently been settled. Ultimately, both sides were right… just for vastly different situations. RSS has demonstrated the power of pourable content, and is a powerful testament to the idea of web as an all-purpose symantically-coherent content transporter.

On the other side of the coin, most of the websites that people use daily prove just the opposite point. Throughout our design and usability work, we see that pixels really do matter. A box shifted 5 pixels left doesn’t visually parent another object correctly… a min-width layout failure suddenly makes a site unnavigable… a snippet of text blown out of its borders just looks bad.